<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Potato Man's Blog</title>
    <link>http://www.lparky.com/blog/</link>
    <description>from the vegetable also known as Louis Parks</description>
    <copyright>Louis Parks</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 02:04:18 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 1.8.5223.0</generator>
    <managingEditor>junkmail@lparky.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>junkmail@lparky.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.lparky.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=dd1f2e86-5b2b-4c50-b1e2-2327d50a6cdc</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.lparky.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,dd1f2e86-5b2b-4c50-b1e2-2327d50a6cdc.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,dd1f2e86-5b2b-4c50-b1e2-2327d50a6cdc.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.lparky.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=dd1f2e86-5b2b-4c50-b1e2-2327d50a6cdc</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      I've had the good fortune begin working with SQL Server 2005 and Visual Studio 2005. 
      I didn't rush right out and write stored procs in C#, but I have jumped into generics
      and anonymous delegates.  I'm using the February 2005 CTP and am impressed.
   </p>
        <p>
      I haven't done a whole lot with new Yukon features, but I have been using the management
      tools / VS integration for a few weeks.  The first and most glaring issue is
      the lack of database diagrams in SQL Server Management Studio.  It seems that
      these will return before RTM, which is a very good thing.  I am very surprised
      that they were ever cut.  I can understand adding them to the VS integration
      piece, but I cannot understand removing them from SMS.  There are a hefty number
      of people that will use SMS and never touch VS...those folks deserve diagrams too.
   </p>
        <p>
      Visual Studio is much quicker and stable than I expected.  So far the C# compiler
      has crashed three times on me and the VB compiler has crashed 15 or so time. 
      Despite that, however, the IDE didn't falter.  The standard send a crash report
      dialog came up, told me which compiler died, etc., but the IDE kept on chugging. 
      Kudos on the resilience.
   </p>
        <p>
      One of my favorite new features is the code definition window...even for native framework
      types.  For those unfamiliar with it (View | Code Definition Window), it shows
      the prototypes (or full code if you've got the source) of the types, functions, etc.
      that you are currently mousing over.  It works like dynamic help does, but instead
      of showing help topics is shows code.  I've got that window full screen on my
      second monitor.  It's far easier to glance at that than it is to "Go to definition"
      then jump back.  It's also easier than firing up Reflector then alt+tabbing back
      to VS.
   </p>
        <p>
      A close second to code definition is the added debugging support.  Debugger visualizers
      have gotten their fare share of press and with good reason.  They are quite nice. 
      What impresses me more is that enhanced immediate window features and the overall
      more helpful exceptions (including the exception window popup).  It's now far
      easier to see exactly where a problem occurred, what the current state of affairs
      is, and how that state was created...the needed info for problem solving.
   </p>
        <p>
      I don't want to give the impression that this build is polished, because it isn't. 
      There is odd behavior now and then that is hard to repro (things just refusing to
      compile, coding executing and failing but then not failing a little later (same bits)),
      etc.).  The keyboard shortcuts are a little rough around the edges (right click,
      g (Generate stub OR Go to definition comes to mind)).  Refactoring / code snippets
      require an extra [enter] keystroke now and then.  All in all, though, I expect
      that RTM in a few months will address these issues.
   </p>
        <p>
       
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=dd1f2e86-5b2b-4c50-b1e2-2327d50a6cdc" />
      </body>
      <title>Whidbey and Yukon first impressions</title>
      <guid>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,dd1f2e86-5b2b-4c50-b1e2-2327d50a6cdc.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.lparky.com/blog/WhidbeyAndYukonFirstImpressions.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 02:04:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   I've had the good fortune begin working with SQL Server 2005 and Visual Studio 2005.&amp;nbsp;
   I didn't rush right out and write stored procs in C#, but I have jumped into generics
   and anonymous delegates.&amp;nbsp; I'm using the February 2005 CTP and am impressed.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   I haven't done a whole lot with new Yukon features, but I have been using the management
   tools / VS integration for a few weeks.&amp;nbsp; The first and most glaring issue is
   the lack of database diagrams in SQL Server Management Studio.&amp;nbsp; It seems that
   these will return before RTM, which is a very good thing.&amp;nbsp; I am very surprised
   that they were ever cut.&amp;nbsp; I can understand adding them to the VS integration
   piece, but I cannot understand removing them from SMS.&amp;nbsp; There are a hefty number
   of people that will use SMS and never touch VS...those folks deserve diagrams too.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Visual Studio is much quicker and stable than I expected.&amp;nbsp; So far the C# compiler
   has crashed three times on me and the VB compiler has crashed 15 or so time.&amp;nbsp;
   Despite that, however, the IDE didn't falter.&amp;nbsp; The standard send a crash report
   dialog came up, told me which compiler died, etc., but the IDE kept on chugging.&amp;nbsp;
   Kudos on the resilience.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   One of my favorite new features is the code definition window...even for native framework
   types.&amp;nbsp; For those unfamiliar with it (View | Code Definition Window), it shows
   the prototypes (or full code if you've got the source) of the types, functions, etc.
   that you are currently mousing over.&amp;nbsp; It works like dynamic help does, but instead
   of showing help topics is shows code.&amp;nbsp; I've got that window full screen on my
   second monitor.&amp;nbsp; It's far easier to glance at that than it is to "Go to definition"
   then jump back.&amp;nbsp; It's also easier than firing up Reflector then alt+tabbing back
   to VS.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   A close second to code definition is the added debugging support.&amp;nbsp; Debugger visualizers
   have gotten their fare share of press and with good reason.&amp;nbsp; They are quite nice.&amp;nbsp;
   What impresses me more is that enhanced immediate window features and the overall
   more helpful exceptions (including the exception window popup).&amp;nbsp; It's now far
   easier to see exactly where a problem occurred, what the current state of affairs
   is, and how that state was created...the needed info for problem solving.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   I don't want to give the impression that this build is polished, because it isn't.&amp;nbsp;
   There is odd behavior now and then that is hard to repro (things just refusing to
   compile, coding executing and failing but then not failing a little later (same bits)),
   etc.).&amp;nbsp; The keyboard shortcuts are a little rough around the edges (right click,
   g (Generate stub OR Go to definition comes to mind)).&amp;nbsp; Refactoring / code snippets
   require an extra [enter] keystroke now and then.&amp;nbsp; All in all, though, I expect
   that RTM in a few months will address these issues.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=dd1f2e86-5b2b-4c50-b1e2-2327d50a6cdc" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,dd1f2e86-5b2b-4c50-b1e2-2327d50a6cdc.aspx</comments>
      <category>Software Review;Technical</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.lparky.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=1534cefa-4164-4bcd-9bad-d693950fe148</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.lparky.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,1534cefa-4164-4bcd-9bad-d693950fe148.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,1534cefa-4164-4bcd-9bad-d693950fe148.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.lparky.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=1534cefa-4164-4bcd-9bad-d693950fe148</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      I've been playing with Money for a few days.  Overall, I'm happy with it, but
      there are some annoying items.
   </p>
        <ul>
          <li>
         A good deal of text is not selectable.  I should be able to select any text (especially
         account info, amounts, payee names, etc.) and copy it elsewhere.</li>
          <li>
         If you select "Online Registration" from the About dialog, you can't close it without
         registering.  There's no "x" to close it.  There's no cancel button. 
         Not even alt+F4 works.</li>
          <li>
         It includes items that a common person wouldn't consider as income as income items. 
         I'd guess that if I make a credit card payment, that most people wouldn't consider
         the credit of that payment to my account as income.  I realize that it is from
         an accounting perspective, but I'm not interested in GAAP here.  I just want
         to know how much money I have coming in from work (e.g. what regular people consider
         income).</li>
        </ul>
        <p>
      On the upside, they fixed a huge bug that previous version had (the last version I
      used was 2002).  If you have more than one account with a financial institution,
      Money is OK with that now.  In the past, I had to play games to make Money happy
      because I had two cards from one lender.
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=1534cefa-4164-4bcd-9bad-d693950fe148" />
      </body>
      <title>Microsoft Money 2005</title>
      <guid>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,1534cefa-4164-4bcd-9bad-d693950fe148.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.lparky.com/blog/MicrosoftMoney2005.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2005 06:09:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   I've been playing with Money for a few days.&amp;nbsp; Overall, I'm happy with it, but
   there are some annoying items.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      A good deal of text is not selectable.&amp;nbsp; I should be able to select any text (especially
      account info, amounts, payee names, etc.) and copy it elsewhere.&lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      If you select "Online Registration" from the About dialog, you can't close it without
      registering.&amp;nbsp; There's no "x" to close it.&amp;nbsp; There's no cancel button.&amp;nbsp;
      Not even alt+F4 works.&lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      It includes items that a common person wouldn't consider as income as income items.&amp;nbsp;
      I'd guess that if I make a credit card payment, that most people wouldn't consider
      the credit of that payment to my account as income.&amp;nbsp; I realize that it is from
      an accounting perspective, but I'm not interested in GAAP here.&amp;nbsp; I just want
      to know how much money I have coming in from work (e.g. what regular people consider
      income).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   On the upside, they fixed a huge bug that previous version had (the last version I
   used was 2002).&amp;nbsp; If you have more than one account with a financial institution,
   Money is OK with that now.&amp;nbsp; In the past, I had to play games to make Money happy
   because I had two cards from one lender.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=1534cefa-4164-4bcd-9bad-d693950fe148" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,1534cefa-4164-4bcd-9bad-d693950fe148.aspx</comments>
      <category>About Me;General;Software Review</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.lparky.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=8c647c52-eb65-43b0-b47c-0cbb45503b57</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.lparky.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,8c647c52-eb65-43b0-b47c-0cbb45503b57.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,8c647c52-eb65-43b0-b47c-0cbb45503b57.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.lparky.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=8c647c52-eb65-43b0-b47c-0cbb45503b57</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      So, intraVnews lost my state.  Losing state was the same reason that I dropped
      SharpReader several months ago.  To be honest, I've got other gripes against
      intraVnews.  It often can't seem to read feeds.  After a few tries on a
      feed, it permanently ignores it (you have to explicitly re-enable the feed by reseting
      feed history or something similar).  It doesn't tell you when it's ignoring feeds. 
      It doesn't have an easy to find and explicit means to update a feed right this second!
   </p>
        <p>
      So, I've switched.  I've been a faithful reader (other than when intraVnews was
      ignoring the feed) of <a href="http://www.25hoursaday.com/weblog/">Dare</a>'s for
      about a year now.  I've read all about the great <a href="http://www.rssbandit.org/">RSS
      Bandit </a>and have decided to give it a second chance.  (I tried it a while
      back and was less than happy about it for some reason.)  Here's to hoping it
      maintains my state!
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=8c647c52-eb65-43b0-b47c-0cbb45503b57" />
      </body>
      <title>Good bye intraVnews, Hello RSS Bandit</title>
      <guid>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,8c647c52-eb65-43b0-b47c-0cbb45503b57.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.lparky.com/blog/GoodByeIntraVnewsHelloRSSBandit.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2004 04:02:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   So, intraVnews lost my state.&amp;nbsp; Losing state was the same reason that I dropped
   SharpReader several months ago.&amp;nbsp; To be honest, I've got other gripes against
   intraVnews.&amp;nbsp; It often can't seem to read feeds.&amp;nbsp; After a few tries on a
   feed, it permanently ignores it (you have to explicitly re-enable the feed by reseting
   feed history or something similar).&amp;nbsp; It doesn't tell you when it's ignoring feeds.&amp;nbsp;
   It doesn't have an easy to find and explicit means to update a feed right this second!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   So, I've switched.&amp;nbsp; I've been a faithful reader (other than when intraVnews was
   ignoring the feed) of &lt;a href="http://www.25hoursaday.com/weblog/"&gt;Dare&lt;/a&gt;'s for
   about a year now.&amp;nbsp; I've read all about the great &lt;a href="http://www.rssbandit.org/"&gt;RSS
   Bandit &lt;/a&gt;and have decided to give it a second chance.&amp;nbsp; (I tried it a while
   back and was less than happy about it for some reason.)&amp;nbsp; Here's to hoping it
   maintains my state!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=8c647c52-eb65-43b0-b47c-0cbb45503b57" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,8c647c52-eb65-43b0-b47c-0cbb45503b57.aspx</comments>
      <category>About Me;Software Review;Technical</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.lparky.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=a7049f67-5814-45db-aa78-3c5e0631fe8c</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.lparky.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,a7049f67-5814-45db-aa78-3c5e0631fe8c.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,a7049f67-5814-45db-aa78-3c5e0631fe8c.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.lparky.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=a7049f67-5814-45db-aa78-3c5e0631fe8c</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      Over the past few days, I've seen the outlook.exe process eating up 300 MB + RAM. 
      A few times, I'd get dialogs complaining of <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/cpref/html/frlrfsystemoutofmemoryexceptionclasstopic.asp">OOM
      exceptions</a>.  I've got 1 GB RAM on this box, why the heck does Outlook need
      more?!
   </p>
        <p>
      I've got Microsoft Outlook 2003 SP 1, <a href="http://www.intravnews.com/download.aspx">intraVnews </a>1.0.1468.32636,
      and <a href="http://www.lookoutsoft.com/Lookout/download.html">Lookout </a>1.2.0.1924
      installed.  I know intraVnews is written in a .NET language.  Perhaps Lookout
      is too.  As it turns out, I installed Whidbey beta 1 this week.  My Outlook
      addins now bind to it rather than 1.1, which they were compiled against.  I'm
      guessing a combination of Whidbey being a beta product and differences between 1.1
      and 2.0 caused my problem.  After uninstalling Whidbey, all was well again. 
      OK, mostly well, intraVnews lost all the state info for my feeds, but that's another
      story.
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=a7049f67-5814-45db-aa78-3c5e0631fe8c" />
      </body>
      <title>OutOfMemoryException</title>
      <guid>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,a7049f67-5814-45db-aa78-3c5e0631fe8c.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.lparky.com/blog/OutOfMemoryException.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2004 03:56:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   Over the past few days, I've seen the outlook.exe process eating up 300 MB + RAM.&amp;nbsp;
   A few times, I'd get dialogs complaining of &lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/cpref/html/frlrfsystemoutofmemoryexceptionclasstopic.asp"&gt;OOM
   exceptions&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; I've got 1 GB RAM on this box, why the heck does Outlook need
   more?!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   I've got Microsoft Outlook 2003 SP 1, &lt;a href="http://www.intravnews.com/download.aspx"&gt;intraVnews &lt;/a&gt;1.0.1468.32636,
   and &lt;a href="http://www.lookoutsoft.com/Lookout/download.html"&gt;Lookout &lt;/a&gt;1.2.0.1924
   installed.&amp;nbsp; I know intraVnews is written in a .NET language.&amp;nbsp; Perhaps Lookout
   is too.&amp;nbsp; As it turns out, I installed Whidbey beta 1 this week.&amp;nbsp; My Outlook
   addins now bind to it rather than 1.1, which they were compiled against.&amp;nbsp; I'm
   guessing a combination of Whidbey being a beta product and differences between 1.1
   and 2.0 caused my problem.&amp;nbsp; After uninstalling Whidbey, all was well again.&amp;nbsp;
   OK, mostly well, intraVnews lost all the state info for my feeds, but that's another
   story.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=a7049f67-5814-45db-aa78-3c5e0631fe8c" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,a7049f67-5814-45db-aa78-3c5e0631fe8c.aspx</comments>
      <category>About Me;Software Review;Technical</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.lparky.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=ce9a73ac-1b1f-41f4-aa8e-17410837b965</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.lparky.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,ce9a73ac-1b1f-41f4-aa8e-17410837b965.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,ce9a73ac-1b1f-41f4-aa8e-17410837b965.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.lparky.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=ce9a73ac-1b1f-41f4-aa8e-17410837b965</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      Back in the day, I used home+home+down to get to the bottom of a document.  That
      was in WordPerfect 5.1 for DOS.  I should probably go to the trouble of finding
      out if Word supports a “go to the last line of the last page” feature. 
      For the time being, I use the time honored control+g.  For those that don't know,
      this brings up a dialog asking you which line you'd like to go to (this works in notepad, <a href="http://www.flos-freeware.ch/notepad2.html">notepad2</a>,
      Word, and probably many other applications).  Word (at least in version 2003)
      also allows you to navigate a certain number of pages from the current page using
      the control+g (aka Find, Replace, Goto) dialog box.  So, +1000 was all I needed
      to quickly get to the end of my 4574 page document.  Cool, huh?
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=ce9a73ac-1b1f-41f4-aa8e-17410837b965" />
      </body>
      <title>Find, Replace, Go To in Microsoft Office Word 2003</title>
      <guid>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,ce9a73ac-1b1f-41f4-aa8e-17410837b965.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.lparky.com/blog/FindReplaceGoToInMicrosoftOfficeWord2003.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2004 02:13:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   Back in the day, I used home+home+down to get to the bottom of a document.&amp;nbsp; That
   was in WordPerfect 5.1 for DOS.&amp;nbsp; I should probably go to the trouble of finding
   out if Word supports a &amp;#8220;go to the last line of the last page&amp;#8221; feature.&amp;nbsp;
   For the time being, I use the time honored control+g.&amp;nbsp; For those that don't know,
   this brings up a dialog asking you which line you'd like to go to (this works in notepad, &lt;a href="http://www.flos-freeware.ch/notepad2.html"&gt;notepad2&lt;/a&gt;,
   Word, and probably many other applications).&amp;nbsp; Word (at least in version 2003)
   also allows you to navigate a certain number of pages from the current page using
   the control+g (aka Find, Replace, Goto) dialog box.&amp;nbsp; So, +1000 was all I needed
   to quickly get to the end of my 4574 page document.&amp;nbsp; Cool, huh?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=ce9a73ac-1b1f-41f4-aa8e-17410837b965" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,ce9a73ac-1b1f-41f4-aa8e-17410837b965.aspx</comments>
      <category>About Me;Software Review</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.lparky.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=4498a72f-4c84-4908-ade9-a13d1b085c06</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.lparky.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,4498a72f-4c84-4908-ade9-a13d1b085c06.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,4498a72f-4c84-4908-ade9-a13d1b085c06.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.lparky.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=4498a72f-4c84-4908-ade9-a13d1b085c06</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      In no particular order
   </p>
        <ul>
          <li>
         Access to the only search engine I use</li>
          <ul>
            <li>
            Their results return very quickly</li>
            <li>
            Their results are pretty accurate</li>
            <li>
            Filters like site: are very easy to use</li>
            <li>
            Page caching...you can get your results even if the site itself no longer has the
            page</li>
          </ul>
          <li>
         Memory of my last 20 searches</li>
          <li>
         Drag and drop searching - just drop a word or phrase into the search box...you don't
         even have to hit enter or click Go</li>
          <li>
         Display of a page's Google PageRank</li>
          <li>
         One click to see who links to this page (Info Button | Backward links)</li>
          <li>
         Toggle-able highlighter for all search terms</li>
        </ul>
        <p>
      There are others, but these are the biggest for me.
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=4498a72f-4c84-4908-ade9-a13d1b085c06" />
      </body>
      <title>Why I love the Google toolbar</title>
      <guid>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,4498a72f-4c84-4908-ade9-a13d1b085c06.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.lparky.com/blog/WhyILoveTheGoogleToolbar.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2004 00:54:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   In no particular order
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      Access to the only search engine I use&lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;ul&gt;
      &lt;li&gt;
         Their results return very quickly&lt;/li&gt;
      &lt;li&gt;
         Their results are pretty accurate&lt;/li&gt;
      &lt;li&gt;
         Filters like site: are very easy to use&lt;/li&gt;
      &lt;li&gt;
         Page caching...you can get your results even if the site itself no longer has the
         page&lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;/ul&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      Memory of my last 20 searches&lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      Drag and drop searching - just drop a word or phrase into the search box...you don't
      even have to hit enter or click Go&lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      Display of a page's Google PageRank&lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      One click to see who links to this page (Info Button | Backward links)&lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;li&gt;
      Toggle-able highlighter for all search terms&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   There are others, but these are the biggest for me.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=4498a72f-4c84-4908-ade9-a13d1b085c06" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,4498a72f-4c84-4908-ade9-a13d1b085c06.aspx</comments>
      <category>About Me;Software Review;Technical</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.lparky.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=1db5bf97-b65e-4842-a5e2-42091e6adbf1</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.lparky.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,1db5bf97-b65e-4842-a5e2-42091e6adbf1.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,1db5bf97-b65e-4842-a5e2-42091e6adbf1.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.lparky.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=1db5bf97-b65e-4842-a5e2-42091e6adbf1</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      Norton Internet Security 2004 has a great many components - Anti-Virus, Ad blocking,
      firewall, anti-spam, etc.  Why does the custom installer not give the user the
      option of only installing the components he wants?
   </p>
        <p>
      Second question - why is it that when LiveUpdate fails to update a component, about
      the <a href="http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/sharedtech.nsf/docid/2003082911090713?OpenDocument&amp;src=_mi&amp;product=LU&amp;version=1.9&amp;language=english&amp;module=LU&amp;error=1812&amp;build=Symantec">only
      fix available is to uninstall NIS and reinstall it</a>?  (If that doesn't work,
      I suppose it means you wasted a fair amount of money.)
   </p>
        <p>
      If I could ever manage to convince NIS to install and get fully updated, I'd see how
      much I like to compared to <a href="http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,5832aa01-30ee-4abc-9ef4-67c13ee0b431.aspx">McAfee</a>. 
      For the time being, it seems I'm out of luck.
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=1db5bf97-b65e-4842-a5e2-42091e6adbf1" />
      </body>
      <title>When setup isn't just double clicking setup.exe</title>
      <guid>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,1db5bf97-b65e-4842-a5e2-42091e6adbf1.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.lparky.com/blog/WhenSetupIsntJustDoubleClickingSetupexe.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2004 02:56:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   Norton Internet Security 2004 has a great many components - Anti-Virus, Ad blocking,
   firewall, anti-spam, etc.&amp;nbsp; Why does the custom installer not give the user the
   option of only installing the components he wants?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Second question - why is it that when LiveUpdate fails to update a component, about
   the &lt;a href="http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/sharedtech.nsf/docid/2003082911090713?OpenDocument&amp;amp;src=_mi&amp;amp;product=LU&amp;amp;version=1.9&amp;amp;language=english&amp;amp;module=LU&amp;amp;error=1812&amp;amp;build=Symantec"&gt;only
   fix available is to uninstall NIS and reinstall it&lt;/a&gt;?&amp;nbsp; (If that doesn't work,
   I suppose it means you wasted a fair amount of money.)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   If I could ever manage to convince NIS to install and get fully updated, I'd see how
   much I like to compared to &lt;a href="http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,5832aa01-30ee-4abc-9ef4-67c13ee0b431.aspx"&gt;McAfee&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;
   For the time being, it seems I'm out of luck.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=1db5bf97-b65e-4842-a5e2-42091e6adbf1" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,1db5bf97-b65e-4842-a5e2-42091e6adbf1.aspx</comments>
      <category>Software Review;Technical</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.lparky.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=b0db3fde-06fc-477f-a078-9be3a7782666</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.lparky.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,b0db3fde-06fc-477f-a078-9be3a7782666.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,b0db3fde-06fc-477f-a078-9be3a7782666.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.lparky.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=b0db3fde-06fc-477f-a078-9be3a7782666</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      Ever wonder why IE remembers all the invalid URLs you type in?  Me too. 
      I typed in <a href="http://www.lpark.com/blog">http://www.lpark.com/blog</a> (which
      gives the equivalent of a 404) yesterday, and for some annoying reason, IE remembers
      it.  What's up with that?
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=b0db3fde-06fc-477f-a078-9be3a7782666" />
      </body>
      <title>Remembering every little thing</title>
      <guid>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,b0db3fde-06fc-477f-a078-9be3a7782666.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.lparky.com/blog/RememberingEveryLittleThing.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2004 03:43:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   Ever wonder why IE remembers all the invalid URLs you type in?&amp;nbsp; Me too.&amp;nbsp;
   I typed in &lt;a href="http://www.lpark.com/blog"&gt;http://www.lpark.com/blog&lt;/a&gt; (which
   gives the equivalent of a 404) yesterday, and for some annoying reason, IE remembers
   it.&amp;nbsp; What's up with that?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=b0db3fde-06fc-477f-a078-9be3a7782666" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,b0db3fde-06fc-477f-a078-9be3a7782666.aspx</comments>
      <category>About Me;Software Review;Technical</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.lparky.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=af3f9116-ae2c-4e21-bae6-394dcaf2f906</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.lparky.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,af3f9116-ae2c-4e21-bae6-394dcaf2f906.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,af3f9116-ae2c-4e21-bae6-394dcaf2f906.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.lparky.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=af3f9116-ae2c-4e21-bae6-394dcaf2f906</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      I've been using the RTW of <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/player/download/download.aspx">Windows
      Media Player 10</a> for a few days now.  Generally speaking, I'm happy with it. 
      The “I'll keep appearing when you mouse near me“ menu bar bug (or was
      that a feature?) is now dead.  You can now open an AV file from the Internet
      and still resume what you were listening to before (big kudos on this!). 
      Here are a few gripes..
   </p>
        <p>
      At last count, I had 1460 wma files and 1621 mp3 files.  The files were ripped
      from CDs I legally own or were legally downloaded (mostly audio books in mp3). 
      So, all my stuff is legal, yet WMP10 prompts me at every available opportunity to
      buy the CD of the currently playing song.  Is there any reason I should buy something
      I already own?  Does WMP10 think that I have illegal songs?  I'm all for
      helping people to be legal and I'm all for letting people know they can buy music
      directly via WMP10, but I'm not for the implication (or waste of screen real estate)
      that my stuff is not legit.
   </p>
        <p>
      I don't really like the embedded IE in WMP.  OK, I don't know for sure that it's
      IE, but I'm pretty dang sure.  IE or not, I'm annoyed that I have to use WMP's
      menus to navigate stuff.  No forward/back via my mouse (IntelliMouse Explorer
      4.0).  No alt+right arrow/alt+left arrow.  No right clicking.  Grr. 
      You know it's a browser.  I know it's a browser.  Let's stop playing games
      and let me use it as a browser.
   </p>
        <p>
      I wonder why Play Count is still not in the standard set of displayed columns. 
      I care far more about it than I do about genre or whether it is DRM'ed.  What
      I'd like is a “make all views look like this one” so I can set the columns
      I want to see in the order I want to see them.
   </p>
        <p>
      I like the new color schemes, but I think they need a bit of polishing.  First,
      altering colors still requires too much menu navigation (View | Enhancements |
      Color Chooser).  What happened to that paint brush icon in the lower right corner
      that WMP9 had?  Second, the colors are a bit too, well, I'm not a graphic design
      guy, so I don't know what to call it.  I know, though, that white text on a shiny
      gold-ish background is really hard to read though.  I know that the mini player
      looks a bit too much like over zealous use of lens flairs.  Third, why is there
      no option for the player's color to match that of the currently selected Windows XP
      visual style?  Fourth, in mini player mode, why does the volume control background
      color not reflect the color of the rest of the player?  My color is currently
      gold-ish (I'm trying to match the Olive visual style), but the volume control is light
      blue.
   </p>
        <p>
      I really don't like the popup “This is what's playing“ that happens when
      you mouse near the player in mini mode.  I'd like to disable that.  I don't
      need to know what's playing (I can hear it), and I don't need to see a mini visualization
      window.
   </p>
        <p>
      All in all, I prefer it to WMP9 (and all other players I've used).  Still, there
      are some issues that I hope are resolved in the next release.
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=af3f9116-ae2c-4e21-bae6-394dcaf2f906" />
      </body>
      <title>Windows Media Player 10...a few thoughts</title>
      <guid>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,af3f9116-ae2c-4e21-bae6-394dcaf2f906.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.lparky.com/blog/WindowsMediaPlayer10aFewThoughts.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2004 23:22:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   I've been using the RTW of &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/player/download/download.aspx"&gt;Windows
   Media Player 10&lt;/a&gt; for a few days now.&amp;nbsp; Generally speaking, I'm happy with it.&amp;nbsp;
   The &amp;#8220;I'll keep appearing when you mouse near me&amp;#8220; menu bar bug (or was
   that a feature?) is now dead.&amp;nbsp; You can now open an AV file&amp;nbsp;from the Internet
   and&amp;nbsp;still resume what you were listening to before (big kudos on this!).&amp;nbsp;
   Here are a few gripes..
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   At last count, I had 1460 wma files and 1621 mp3 files.&amp;nbsp; The files were ripped
   from CDs I legally own or were legally downloaded (mostly audio books in mp3).&amp;nbsp;
   So, all my stuff is legal, yet WMP10 prompts me at every available opportunity to
   buy the CD of the currently playing song.&amp;nbsp; Is there any reason I should buy something
   I already own?&amp;nbsp; Does WMP10 think that I have illegal songs?&amp;nbsp; I'm all for
   helping people to be legal and I'm all for letting people know they can buy music
   directly via WMP10, but I'm not for the implication (or waste of screen real estate)
   that my stuff is not legit.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   I don't really like the embedded IE in WMP.&amp;nbsp; OK, I don't know for sure that it's
   IE, but I'm pretty dang sure.&amp;nbsp; IE or not, I'm annoyed that I have to use WMP's
   menus to navigate stuff.&amp;nbsp; No forward/back via my mouse (IntelliMouse Explorer
   4.0).&amp;nbsp; No alt+right arrow/alt+left arrow.&amp;nbsp; No right clicking.&amp;nbsp; Grr.&amp;nbsp;
   You know it's a browser.&amp;nbsp; I know it's a browser.&amp;nbsp; Let's stop playing games
   and let me use it as a browser.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   I wonder why Play Count is still not in the standard set of displayed columns.&amp;nbsp;
   I care far more about it than I do about genre or whether it is DRM'ed.&amp;nbsp; What
   I'd like is a &amp;#8220;make all views look like this one&amp;#8221; so I can set the columns
   I want to see in the order I want to see them.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   I like the new color schemes, but I think they need a bit of polishing.&amp;nbsp; First,
   altering colors still requires too much menu navigation (View | Enhancements&amp;nbsp;|
   Color Chooser).&amp;nbsp; What happened to that paint brush icon in the lower right corner
   that WMP9 had?&amp;nbsp; Second, the colors are a bit too, well, I'm not a graphic design
   guy, so I don't know what to call it.&amp;nbsp; I know, though, that white text on a shiny
   gold-ish background is really hard to read though.&amp;nbsp; I know that the mini player
   looks a bit too much like over zealous use of lens flairs.&amp;nbsp; Third, why is there
   no option for the player's color to match that of the currently selected Windows XP
   visual style?&amp;nbsp; Fourth, in mini player mode, why does the volume control background
   color not reflect the color of the rest of the player?&amp;nbsp; My color is currently
   gold-ish (I'm trying to match the Olive visual style), but the volume control is light
   blue.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   I really don't like the popup &amp;#8220;This is what's playing&amp;#8220; that happens when
   you mouse near the player in mini mode.&amp;nbsp; I'd like to disable that.&amp;nbsp; I don't
   need to know what's playing (I can hear it), and I don't need to see a mini visualization
   window.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   All in all, I prefer it to WMP9 (and all other players I've used).&amp;nbsp; Still, there
   are some issues that I hope are resolved in the next release.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=af3f9116-ae2c-4e21-bae6-394dcaf2f906" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,af3f9116-ae2c-4e21-bae6-394dcaf2f906.aspx</comments>
      <category>About Me;Music;Software Review;Technical</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.lparky.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=8ff12973-ed97-4ce1-b5a4-7c1f1d71028b</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.lparky.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,8ff12973-ed97-4ce1-b5a4-7c1f1d71028b.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,8ff12973-ed97-4ce1-b5a4-7c1f1d71028b.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.lparky.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=8ff12973-ed97-4ce1-b5a4-7c1f1d71028b</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      Take a look at this HTML document.
   </p>
        <p>
      &lt;html&gt;<br />
       &lt;head&gt;<br />
        &lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;<br />
         function process(isIE)<br />
         {<br />
          var element = null;<br />
          if(isIE)<br />
          {<br />
           element = document.getElementById("txtStuff");<br />
          }<br />
          else<br />
          {<br />
           element = document.bob.txtStuff;<br />
          }<br />
          alert(element.value);<br />
         }<br />
        &lt;/script&gt;<br />
       &lt;/head&gt;<br />
       &lt;body&gt;<br />
        &lt;form name="bob" onsubmit="process()"&gt;<br />
         &lt;input type="text" name="txtStuff"&gt;<br />
         &lt;input type="button" value="Submit IE" onclick="process(true)"&gt;<br />
         &lt;input type="button" value="Submit Firefox" onclick="process(false)"&gt;<br />
        &lt;/form&gt;<br />
       &lt;/body&gt;<br />
      &lt;/html&gt;
   </p>
        <p>
      Why is it that if an &lt;input&gt; is in a form, Firefox (0.9.2 / Win) can't use getElementById
      to find it?  Either method works just fine in IE.
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=8ff12973-ed97-4ce1-b5a4-7c1f1d71028b" />
      </body>
      <title>Firefox and getElementById()</title>
      <guid>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,8ff12973-ed97-4ce1-b5a4-7c1f1d71028b.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.lparky.com/blog/FirefoxAndGetElementById.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2004 04:48:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   Take a look at this HTML document.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   &amp;lt;html&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;head&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;script type="text/javascript"&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;function process(isIE)&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;{&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;var element = null;&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;if(isIE)&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;{&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;element = document.getElementById("txtStuff");&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;}&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;else&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;{&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;element = document.bob.txtStuff;&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;}&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;alert(element.value);&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;}&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;/script&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;/head&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;body&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;form name="bob" onsubmit="process()"&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;input type="text" name="txtStuff"&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;input type="button" value="Submit IE" onclick="process(true)"&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;input type="button" value="Submit Firefox" onclick="process(false)"&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;/form&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;nbsp;&amp;lt;/body&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;
   &amp;lt;/html&amp;gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Why is it that if an &amp;lt;input&amp;gt; is in a form, Firefox (0.9.2 / Win) can't use getElementById
   to find it?&amp;nbsp; Either method works just fine in IE.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=8ff12973-ed97-4ce1-b5a4-7c1f1d71028b" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,8ff12973-ed97-4ce1-b5a4-7c1f1d71028b.aspx</comments>
      <category>Software Review;Technical</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.lparky.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=c6d397c7-4baf-4b97-9d51-05f8c5f2ca2c</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.lparky.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,c6d397c7-4baf-4b97-9d51-05f8c5f2ca2c.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,c6d397c7-4baf-4b97-9d51-05f8c5f2ca2c.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.lparky.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=c6d397c7-4baf-4b97-9d51-05f8c5f2ca2c</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      Operating System: Windows XP Service Pack 2 (RTM)
   </p>
        <p>
      Default browser: Mozilla Fire fox 0.9.2.
   </p>
        <p>
      Application in use: MSN Messenger 6.2.0137
   </p>
        <p>
      Problem: When I click a hyperlink in a messenger conversation, the link opens in IE
      not in Firefox.
   </p>
        <p>
      Problem with attitude: I'd think that after the whole hoo-haa Microsoft had to deal
      with over bundling IE in Windows, that it would reign in its applications and make
      them obey the settings in Set Program Access and Defaults.  MSN Messenger, Outlook
      2003 SP 1, and Outlook Express 6 Service Pack 2 all quite often ignore my default
      browser setting.  I'm not amused, Microsoft.
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=c6d397c7-4baf-4b97-9d51-05f8c5f2ca2c" />
      </body>
      <title>Default...Smeefault OR How to write applications that ignore user settings</title>
      <guid>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,c6d397c7-4baf-4b97-9d51-05f8c5f2ca2c.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.lparky.com/blog/DefaultSmeefaultORHowToWriteApplicationsThatIgnoreUserSettings.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 00:05:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   Operating System: Windows XP Service Pack 2 (RTM)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Default browser: Mozilla Fire fox 0.9.2.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Application in use: MSN Messenger 6.2.0137
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Problem: When I click a hyperlink in a messenger conversation, the link opens in IE
   not in Firefox.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Problem with attitude: I'd think that after the whole hoo-haa Microsoft had to deal
   with over bundling IE in Windows, that it would reign in its applications and make
   them obey the settings in Set Program Access and Defaults.&amp;nbsp; MSN Messenger, Outlook
   2003 SP 1, and Outlook Express 6&amp;nbsp;Service Pack 2 all quite often ignore my default
   browser setting.&amp;nbsp; I'm not amused, Microsoft.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=c6d397c7-4baf-4b97-9d51-05f8c5f2ca2c" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,c6d397c7-4baf-4b97-9d51-05f8c5f2ca2c.aspx</comments>
      <category>About Me;Software Review;Technical</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.lparky.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=132cd8b1-a5b6-4433-bae9-62310202022d</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.lparky.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,132cd8b1-a5b6-4433-bae9-62310202022d.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,132cd8b1-a5b6-4433-bae9-62310202022d.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.lparky.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=132cd8b1-a5b6-4433-bae9-62310202022d</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      I've been playing (no pun intended) with the Windows Media Player 10 beta for a while
      now.  I just had a happy moment that needs sharing.  One of my biggest beefs
      with WMP in the past is that you can't have two instances of it going at the same
      time.  This becomes a problem when you're in the midst of listening to some audio
      book (one track is more than an hour long), and you click on a link to hear a 30 second
      music clip...suddenly you've lost your place in the book.  Ugh.
   </p>
        <p>
      WMP 10 now has a “Previous” feature to solve this.  At any time,
      you can click Previous (if you're in standard mode (non skin, non task bar tool bar
      mode), it's the same as the back button you'd hit for going back one track in a playlist)
      to return to your previous track.  It'll begin playing as if you had just hit
      Pause then Play.
   </p>
        <p>
      One other really annoying bug from WMP 7 - 9 is the “hide my form title bar,
      unless you mouse over me, in which case I'll reappear even though you told me you
      didn't want to see me” bug.  In WMP 10, when you tell the title bar (which
      includes the form border) to disappear, it does.  Period.  You can get it
      back if you want it, but it won't come back until you tell it to.  Thanks WMP
      10, for finally obeying the user.
   </p>
        <p>
      Generally, it has more fit and finish than previous versions.  Kudos to the Windows
      Media team for the enhancements and for releasing a pretty stable beta.  I think
      this is the only beta of a WMP version (other than perhaps the refreshes of 9) that
      has been stable.
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=132cd8b1-a5b6-4433-bae9-62310202022d" />
      </body>
      <title>Happiness with Windows Media Player 10</title>
      <guid>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,132cd8b1-a5b6-4433-bae9-62310202022d.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.lparky.com/blog/HappinessWithWindowsMediaPlayer10.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2004 01:56:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   I've been playing (no pun intended) with the Windows Media Player 10 beta for a while
   now.&amp;nbsp; I just had a happy moment that needs sharing.&amp;nbsp; One of my biggest beefs
   with WMP in the past is that you can't have two instances of it going at the same
   time.&amp;nbsp; This becomes a problem when you're in the midst of listening to some audio
   book (one track is more than an hour long), and you click on a link to hear a 30 second
   music clip...suddenly you've lost your place in the book.&amp;nbsp; Ugh.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   WMP 10 now has a &amp;#8220;Previous&amp;#8221; feature to solve this.&amp;nbsp; At any time,
   you can click Previous (if you're in standard mode (non skin, non task bar tool bar
   mode), it's the same as the back button you'd hit for going back one track in a playlist)
   to return to your previous track.&amp;nbsp; It'll begin playing as if you had just hit
   Pause then Play.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   One other really annoying bug from WMP 7 - 9 is the &amp;#8220;hide my form title bar,
   unless you mouse over me, in which case I'll reappear even though you told me you
   didn't want to see me&amp;#8221; bug.&amp;nbsp; In WMP 10, when you tell the title bar (which
   includes the form border) to disappear, it does.&amp;nbsp; Period.&amp;nbsp; You can get it
   back if you want it, but it won't come back until you tell it to.&amp;nbsp; Thanks WMP
   10, for finally obeying the user.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Generally, it has more fit and finish than previous versions.&amp;nbsp; Kudos to the Windows
   Media team for the enhancements and for releasing a pretty stable beta.&amp;nbsp; I think
   this is the only beta of a WMP version (other than perhaps the refreshes of 9) that
   has been stable.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=132cd8b1-a5b6-4433-bae9-62310202022d" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,132cd8b1-a5b6-4433-bae9-62310202022d.aspx</comments>
      <category>About Me;Software Review;Technical</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.lparky.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=b95f03bd-0653-4a4b-85d8-6e929218bbe3</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.lparky.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,b95f03bd-0653-4a4b-85d8-6e929218bbe3.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>
      </dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,b95f03bd-0653-4a4b-85d8-6e929218bbe3.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.lparky.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=b95f03bd-0653-4a4b-85d8-6e929218bbe3</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      I'm writing this from Windows Longhorn build 4074.  I finally downloaded and
      installed it.  So far it's worked out much better for me than the PDC build did
      last fall.  It definitely needs a lot of work, but it looks good considering
      it's pre beta.
   </p>
        <p>
      One less than happy thing is that FreeTextBox (the default input method for dasBlog)
      doesn't seem to like me typing in it.  Not sure if it's a Longhorn issue or a
      Longhorn via Virtual PC issue.  Either way, it's very annoying.
   </p>
        <p>
      While I'm being annoyed at things, here's something else.  I'm annoyed at DVD
      players that require remote controls to work.  I've got buttons on my player,
      shouldn't I be able to use them to navigate a menu if I lose my remote?  I think
      so.  Toshiba didn't.  I was talking to my brother about this issue last
      night.  Tonight, ugh, I lost my remote.  Fortunately, it only took me about
      10 minutes to find it, but...I'd still prefer to not need the remote to play a disk.
   </p>
        <p>
      I'm also hot and bothered by my sunburn.  One advantage of living in the desert
      is that I can get a sunburn in about 15 minutes.  Yesterday, the sun had me for
      several hours, so my arms, face, and neck are quite red.
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=b95f03bd-0653-4a4b-85d8-6e929218bbe3" />
      </body>
      <title>Weekend update</title>
      <guid>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,b95f03bd-0653-4a4b-85d8-6e929218bbe3.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.lparky.com/blog/WeekendUpdate.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2004 03:27:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   I'm writing this from Windows Longhorn build 4074.&amp;nbsp; I finally downloaded and
   installed it.&amp;nbsp; So far it's worked out much better for me than the PDC build did
   last fall.&amp;nbsp; It definitely needs a lot of work, but it looks good considering
   it's pre beta.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   One less than happy thing is that FreeTextBox (the default input method for dasBlog)
   doesn't seem to like me typing in it.&amp;nbsp; Not sure if it's a Longhorn issue or a
   Longhorn via Virtual PC issue.&amp;nbsp; Either way, it's very annoying.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   While I'm being annoyed at things, here's something else.&amp;nbsp; I'm annoyed at DVD
   players that require remote controls to work.&amp;nbsp; I've got buttons on my player,
   shouldn't I be able to use them to navigate a menu if I lose my remote?&amp;nbsp; I think
   so.&amp;nbsp; Toshiba didn't.&amp;nbsp; I was talking to my brother about this issue last
   night.&amp;nbsp; Tonight, ugh, I lost my remote.&amp;nbsp; Fortunately, it only took me about
   10 minutes to find it, but...I'd still prefer to not need the remote to play a disk.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   I'm also hot and bothered by my sunburn.&amp;nbsp; One advantage of living in the desert
   is that I can get a sunburn in about 15 minutes.&amp;nbsp; Yesterday, the sun had me for
   several hours, so my arms, face, and neck are quite red.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=b95f03bd-0653-4a4b-85d8-6e929218bbe3" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,b95f03bd-0653-4a4b-85d8-6e929218bbe3.aspx</comments>
      <category>About Me;General;Software Review;Technical</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.lparky.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=eaf6d1d5-926b-402d-b737-7133cd8c40fa</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.lparky.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,eaf6d1d5-926b-402d-b737-7133cd8c40fa.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,eaf6d1d5-926b-402d-b737-7133cd8c40fa.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.lparky.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=eaf6d1d5-926b-402d-b737-7133cd8c40fa</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      Grr.  Why doesn't Add / Remove Programs have rich sorting ability (sort by install
      date would be nice).  Why can't I start typing the name of the application and
      navigate to that entry like I can in Windows Explorer?  (I think I know the technical
      reason, but I'm sure some smart guy at Microsoft can overcome it.)  Why is the
      last used date almost always inaccurate?  When you click on the usage terms (Rarely,
      Occasionally, etc.), why does the definition window pop up centered on the screen
      rather than centered to the Add or Remove Programs window?
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=eaf6d1d5-926b-402d-b737-7133cd8c40fa" />
      </body>
      <title>Add / Remove Programs usability issues</title>
      <guid>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,eaf6d1d5-926b-402d-b737-7133cd8c40fa.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.lparky.com/blog/AddRemoveProgramsUsabilityIssues.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2004 02:16:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   Grr.&amp;nbsp; Why doesn't Add / Remove Programs have rich sorting ability (sort by install
   date would be nice).&amp;nbsp; Why can't I start typing the name of the application and
   navigate to that entry like I can in Windows Explorer?&amp;nbsp; (I think I know the technical
   reason, but I'm sure some smart guy at Microsoft can overcome it.)&amp;nbsp; Why is the
   last used date almost always inaccurate?&amp;nbsp; When you click on the usage terms (Rarely,
   Occasionally, etc.), why does the definition window pop up centered on the screen
   rather than centered to the Add or Remove Programs window?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=eaf6d1d5-926b-402d-b737-7133cd8c40fa" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,eaf6d1d5-926b-402d-b737-7133cd8c40fa.aspx</comments>
      <category>Software Review;Technical</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.lparky.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=6ea0d3fe-4da3-412e-8139-f012bb41d571</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.lparky.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,6ea0d3fe-4da3-412e-8139-f012bb41d571.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,6ea0d3fe-4da3-412e-8139-f012bb41d571.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.lparky.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=6ea0d3fe-4da3-412e-8139-f012bb41d571</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      I just had one of those “ugh, I'd so much rather use Visual Studio” moments. 
      Unhappily, I'm writing Swing applications using Eclipse.  What took an hour or
      so to cobble together with the Java/Swing/Eclipse combo, I could have done in five
      minutes with the C#/WinForms/Visual Studio combo.  I suppose that my familiarity
      with the latter is one reason for such a drastic difference, but I don't think the
      difference should be as great as a factor of 12.  My first impression of Swing
      is far less than positive.
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=6ea0d3fe-4da3-412e-8139-f012bb41d571" />
      </body>
      <title>Swing...you bug me</title>
      <guid>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,6ea0d3fe-4da3-412e-8139-f012bb41d571.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.lparky.com/blog/SwingyouBugMe.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2004 00:55:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   I just had one of those &amp;#8220;ugh, I'd so much rather use Visual Studio&amp;#8221; moments.&amp;nbsp;
   Unhappily, I'm writing Swing applications using Eclipse.&amp;nbsp; What took an hour or
   so to cobble together with the Java/Swing/Eclipse combo, I could have done in five
   minutes with the C#/WinForms/Visual Studio combo.&amp;nbsp; I suppose that my familiarity
   with the latter is one reason for such a drastic difference, but I don't think the
   difference should be as great as a factor of 12.&amp;nbsp; My first impression of Swing
   is far less than positive.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=6ea0d3fe-4da3-412e-8139-f012bb41d571" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,6ea0d3fe-4da3-412e-8139-f012bb41d571.aspx</comments>
      <category>About Me;Software Review;Technical</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.lparky.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=b762fda9-ddf9-49fc-9e34-5799b04f0ab6</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.lparky.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,b762fda9-ddf9-49fc-9e34-5799b04f0ab6.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,b762fda9-ddf9-49fc-9e34-5799b04f0ab6.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.lparky.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=b762fda9-ddf9-49fc-9e34-5799b04f0ab6</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      I've been using Outlook for a long time now.  In fact I've used every version
      (97, 98, 2000, 2002, and 2003).  Only a few minutes ago did I realize sometimes
      when Outlook displays a number after a folder (like the number of unread items in
      the inbox) it some times encloses the number in parentheses and other times in square
      brackets.  Also, the number is some times blue and other times green.  Why
      is this so?
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=b762fda9-ddf9-49fc-9e34-5799b04f0ab6" />
      </body>
      <title>Brackets vs. Parentheses</title>
      <guid>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,b762fda9-ddf9-49fc-9e34-5799b04f0ab6.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.lparky.com/blog/BracketsVsParentheses.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2004 13:21:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   I've been using Outlook for a long time now.&amp;nbsp; In fact I've used every version
   (97, 98, 2000, 2002, and 2003).&amp;nbsp; Only a few minutes ago did I realize sometimes
   when Outlook displays a number after a folder (like the number of unread items in
   the inbox) it some times encloses the number in parentheses and other times in square
   brackets.&amp;nbsp; Also, the number is some times blue and other times green.&amp;nbsp; Why
   is this so?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=b762fda9-ddf9-49fc-9e34-5799b04f0ab6" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,b762fda9-ddf9-49fc-9e34-5799b04f0ab6.aspx</comments>
      <category>About Me;Software Review;Technical</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.lparky.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=ca549446-bf4b-49b1-8bd7-e6408f466fe6</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.lparky.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,ca549446-bf4b-49b1-8bd7-e6408f466fe6.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,ca549446-bf4b-49b1-8bd7-e6408f466fe6.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.lparky.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=ca549446-bf4b-49b1-8bd7-e6408f466fe6</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      In August '98, I signed up for my first personal email account.  Mine all mine. 
      In the years that followed a acquired several more.  Other than <a href="http://www.borrowman.net/">Keith</a> sending
      me virii/worms, so I could check out their source, did I have receive evil email. 
      The tide has begun to change.
   </p>
        <p>
      I'm not claiming causation here, but I will state circumstance.  Since I began
      attending University of Phoenix last June, I've begun receiving evil email. 
      More accurately, I've begun receiving evil email at the only two email addresses that
      UoP knows about.  More precisely than that, I've begun receiving evil email at
      two email addresses that are only used for corresponding with UoP - one, my account
      on UoP's domain for the purpose of posting to class newsgroups, the other, an inbound
      only account on my own domain that I created for UoP to send me mail.  Other
      than, perhaps, the federal government when I filled out FAFSA last year, the use of
      these two accounts has been limited to UoP or those attending UoP.  Very curious. 
      I'm not blaming UoP, but circumstantial evidence does point to some connection between
      them and my receiving evil email.
   </p>
        <p>
      Smaller scale and, apparently, less interesting worms found me last summer at the
      aforementioned addresses.  Recently, several Bagles have come visiting. 
      Kudos to UoP for blocking the attachments from reaching me (using Network Associates'
      server AV software) and kudos to Dell for hooking me up with McAfee's AV software
      to protect my other accounts.  I'm glad the AV software knows that I prefer English
      Muffins when given the choice.  I'm hopeful that Win32.EnglishMuffin won't be
      a worm in the near future to visit my inbox.
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=ca549446-bf4b-49b1-8bd7-e6408f466fe6" />
      </body>
      <title>I prefer English Muffins</title>
      <guid>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,ca549446-bf4b-49b1-8bd7-e6408f466fe6.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.lparky.com/blog/IPreferEnglishMuffins.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2004 02:04:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   In August '98, I signed up for my first personal email account.&amp;nbsp; Mine all mine.&amp;nbsp;
   In the years that followed a acquired several more.&amp;nbsp; Other than &lt;a href="http://www.borrowman.net/"&gt;Keith&lt;/a&gt; sending
   me virii/worms, so I could check out their source, did I have receive evil email.&amp;nbsp;
   The tide has begun to change.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   I'm not claiming causation here, but I will state circumstance.&amp;nbsp; Since I began
   attending University of Phoenix last June, I've begun receiving evil email.&amp;nbsp;
   More accurately, I've begun receiving evil email at the only two email addresses that
   UoP knows about.&amp;nbsp; More precisely than that, I've begun receiving evil email at
   two email addresses that are only used for corresponding with UoP - one, my account
   on UoP's domain for the purpose of posting to class newsgroups, the other, an inbound
   only account on my own domain that I created for UoP to send me mail.&amp;nbsp; Other
   than, perhaps, the federal government when I filled out FAFSA last year, the use of
   these two accounts has been limited to UoP or those attending UoP.&amp;nbsp; Very curious.&amp;nbsp;
   I'm not blaming UoP, but circumstantial evidence does point to some connection between
   them and my receiving evil email.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Smaller scale and, apparently, less interesting worms found me last summer at the
   aforementioned addresses.&amp;nbsp; Recently, several Bagles have come visiting.&amp;nbsp;
   Kudos to UoP for blocking the attachments from reaching me (using Network Associates'
   server AV software) and kudos to Dell for hooking me up with McAfee's AV software
   to protect my other accounts.&amp;nbsp; I'm glad the AV software knows that I prefer English
   Muffins when given the choice.&amp;nbsp; I'm hopeful that Win32.EnglishMuffin won't be
   a worm in the near future to visit my inbox.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=ca549446-bf4b-49b1-8bd7-e6408f466fe6" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,ca549446-bf4b-49b1-8bd7-e6408f466fe6.aspx</comments>
      <category>About Me;Software Review;Technical</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.lparky.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=f334170c-d671-41eb-86f0-afdf4e68a955</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.lparky.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,f334170c-d671-41eb-86f0-afdf4e68a955.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,f334170c-d671-41eb-86f0-afdf4e68a955.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.lparky.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=f334170c-d671-41eb-86f0-afdf4e68a955</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      I just installed the Macromedia Shockwave Player and was asked to register it. 
      Though registration is optional, it certainly isn't obvious that it is optional. 
      After installing, a dialog pops up and asks whether your age category (13 or older,
      younger than 13), followed by a dialog asking for your name, email, etc.  You
      can simply hit the close button to close the dialog, but there should be an explanation
      that registration is optional and a “skip registration” button. 
      Shame on you again, Macromedia.
   </p>
        <p>
      To clarify - I'm annoyed at this for a few reasons.  Macromedia makes their client
      software (Flash Player, Shockwave Player, etc.) freely available.  The money
      is made by selling the authoring software.  What Macromedia is doing is getting
      free marketing.  Macromedia customers sell applications (typically web sites),
      and any users of those apps then have to go to Macromedia to get the player software. 
      I'm annoyed at Macromedia taking advantage of this relationship.  I'm also annoyed
      that they don't let the user know that registration is optional.  (If someone
      wants to chime in with “they need your email, so they can notify you of updates”,
      I'll respond with “if any content requires a higher version of the player than
      the one I have, I'll be directed to upgrade my player, so there's no need for Macromedia
      to ever have my email address”)
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=f334170c-d671-41eb-86f0-afdf4e68a955" />
      </body>
      <title>Strike two against Macromedia</title>
      <guid>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,f334170c-d671-41eb-86f0-afdf4e68a955.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.lparky.com/blog/StrikeTwoAgainstMacromedia.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2004 19:38:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   I just installed the Macromedia Shockwave Player and was asked to register it.&amp;nbsp;
   Though registration is optional, it certainly isn't obvious that it is optional.&amp;nbsp;
   After installing, a dialog pops up and asks whether your age category (13 or older,
   younger than 13), followed by a dialog asking for your name, email, etc.&amp;nbsp; You
   can simply hit the close button to close the dialog, but there should be an explanation
   that registration is optional and a &amp;#8220;skip registration&amp;#8221; button.&amp;nbsp;
   Shame on you again, Macromedia.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   To clarify - I'm annoyed at this for a few reasons.&amp;nbsp; Macromedia makes their client
   software (Flash Player, Shockwave Player, etc.) freely available.&amp;nbsp; The money
   is made by selling the authoring software.&amp;nbsp; What Macromedia is doing is getting
   free marketing.&amp;nbsp; Macromedia customers sell applications (typically web sites),
   and any users of those apps then have to go to Macromedia to get the player software.&amp;nbsp;
   I'm annoyed at Macromedia taking advantage of this relationship.&amp;nbsp; I'm also annoyed
   that they don't let the user know that registration is optional.&amp;nbsp; (If someone
   wants to chime in with &amp;#8220;they need your email, so they can notify you of updates&amp;#8221;,
   I'll respond with &amp;#8220;if any content requires a higher version of the player than
   the one I have, I'll be directed to upgrade my player, so there's no need for Macromedia
   to ever have my email address&amp;#8221;)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=f334170c-d671-41eb-86f0-afdf4e68a955" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,f334170c-d671-41eb-86f0-afdf4e68a955.aspx</comments>
      <category>About Me;Software Politics;Software Review</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.lparky.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=8d8cf4f7-2c7d-4c2b-b817-e4a4ebfee322</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.lparky.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,8d8cf4f7-2c7d-4c2b-b817-e4a4ebfee322.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,8d8cf4f7-2c7d-4c2b-b817-e4a4ebfee322.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.lparky.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=8d8cf4f7-2c7d-4c2b-b817-e4a4ebfee322</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      I just installed a junk email filter update for Microsoft Office Outlook 2003 and
      some other update for Microsoft Office Excel 2003.  Earlier today, I installed
      an update for Flash (v6 to v7).  Outlook and Excel didn't require a reboot. 
      The Flash update did.  Shame on you Macromedia!
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=8d8cf4f7-2c7d-4c2b-b817-e4a4ebfee322" />
      </body>
      <title>Rebooting for Flash update</title>
      <guid>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,8d8cf4f7-2c7d-4c2b-b817-e4a4ebfee322.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.lparky.com/blog/RebootingForFlashUpdate.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2004 02:46:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   I just installed a junk email filter update for Microsoft Office Outlook 2003 and
   some other update for Microsoft Office Excel 2003.&amp;nbsp; Earlier today, I installed
   an update for Flash (v6 to v7).&amp;nbsp; Outlook and Excel didn't require a reboot.&amp;nbsp;
   The Flash update did.&amp;nbsp; Shame on you Macromedia!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=8d8cf4f7-2c7d-4c2b-b817-e4a4ebfee322" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,8d8cf4f7-2c7d-4c2b-b817-e4a4ebfee322.aspx</comments>
      <category>About Me;Software Review</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.lparky.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=cb425184-0b4b-4d2e-917e-829869b860a1</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.lparky.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,cb425184-0b4b-4d2e-917e-829869b860a1.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,cb425184-0b4b-4d2e-917e-829869b860a1.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.lparky.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=cb425184-0b4b-4d2e-917e-829869b860a1</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      I'm finally working on a site that lives on IIS 6.  So far it feels slightly
      more friendly to work with (better error messages).  I'm getting used to the
      caching and clearly need to read up on it and how to configure it.  I hope it
      is as good a product as I've heard.
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=cb425184-0b4b-4d2e-917e-829869b860a1" />
      </body>
      <title>First glance at IIS 6</title>
      <guid>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,cb425184-0b4b-4d2e-917e-829869b860a1.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.lparky.com/blog/FirstGlanceAtIIS6.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2004 06:26:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   I'm finally working on a site that lives on IIS 6.&amp;nbsp; So far it feels slightly
   more friendly to work with (better error messages).&amp;nbsp; I'm getting used to the
   caching and clearly need to read up on it and how to configure it.&amp;nbsp; I hope it
   is as good a product as I've heard.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=cb425184-0b4b-4d2e-917e-829869b860a1" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,cb425184-0b4b-4d2e-917e-829869b860a1.aspx</comments>
      <category>About Me;Software Review</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.lparky.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=58da442b-3a6a-4775-852a-f48ffcd68f53</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.lparky.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,58da442b-3a6a-4775-852a-f48ffcd68f53.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,58da442b-3a6a-4775-852a-f48ffcd68f53.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.lparky.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=58da442b-3a6a-4775-852a-f48ffcd68f53</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      Worried about getting PayPal spoofed?  Try the <a href="http://www.ebay.com/ebay_toolbar/">eBay
      Toolbar</a>...on IE for Windows, it'll tell you if you are on the real PayPal.com
      or some phony.  It does other stuff too.  [Thanks Jonathan at <a href="http://www.activewin.com/">AW </a>for
      the reference]
   </p>
        <p>
      By way of software review, I'll state that for some reason, I can't download this
      thing.  I get to the download page, I see the info about a security warning. 
      I don't, however, get the toolbar.  Hmm...perhaps eBay made this public a bit
      too soon?
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=58da442b-3a6a-4775-852a-f48ffcd68f53" />
      </body>
      <title>eBay toolbar</title>
      <guid>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,58da442b-3a6a-4775-852a-f48ffcd68f53.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.lparky.com/blog/eBayToolbar.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2004 02:44:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   Worried about getting PayPal spoofed?&amp;nbsp; Try the &lt;a href="http://www.ebay.com/ebay_toolbar/"&gt;eBay
   Toolbar&lt;/a&gt;...on IE for Windows, it'll tell you if you are on the real PayPal.com
   or some phony.&amp;nbsp; It does other stuff too.&amp;nbsp; [Thanks Jonathan at &lt;a href="http://www.activewin.com/"&gt;AW &lt;/a&gt;for
   the reference]
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   By way of software review, I'll state that for some reason, I can't download this
   thing.&amp;nbsp; I get to the download page, I see the info about a security warning.&amp;nbsp;
   I don't, however, get the toolbar.&amp;nbsp; Hmm...perhaps eBay made this public a bit
   too soon?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=58da442b-3a6a-4775-852a-f48ffcd68f53" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,58da442b-3a6a-4775-852a-f48ffcd68f53.aspx</comments>
      <category>Software Review</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.lparky.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=b178e1d7-46b0-4610-b842-7681c96ed39c</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.lparky.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,b178e1d7-46b0-4610-b842-7681c96ed39c.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,b178e1d7-46b0-4610-b842-7681c96ed39c.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.lparky.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=b178e1d7-46b0-4610-b842-7681c96ed39c</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      Dell still hasn't updated my contract, processed that they've received my old laptop,
      and as a result sent me a new power supply and fixed my very noisy cooling fans. 
      It seems that they are going to get on the ball and make everything all better for
      this growing very disgruntled customer.
   </p>
        <p>
      As a result of my fan issues, though, I've found out something nifty.  It seems
      if my laptop gets too hot and doesn't seem to be able to cool itself off, the processor
      drops its clock speed.  I think I knew this already, and I think its called Intel
      SpeedStep.  This is nifty in its own right, but what impressed me is that when
      viewing system information (Start | Control Panel | System | General tab), the
      section that tells me about my CPU (I think a custom Dell extension) actually
      changes the clock speed figure to the current clock speed.  I was guessing that
      his was a hard coded value based on the max speed of the CPU, but, no, it seems to
      be the current clock speed.  The Support Information button just below that,
      which gives the service tab, express service code, and support phone number are nifty
      too.
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=b178e1d7-46b0-4610-b842-7681c96ed39c" />
      </body>
      <title>Realtime clock speed</title>
      <guid>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,b178e1d7-46b0-4610-b842-7681c96ed39c.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.lparky.com/blog/RealtimeClockSpeed.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2004 00:38:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   Dell still hasn't updated my contract, processed that they've received my old laptop,
   and as a result sent me a new power supply and fixed my very noisy cooling fans.&amp;nbsp;
   It seems that they are going to get on the ball and make everything all better for
   this growing very disgruntled customer.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   As a result of my fan issues, though, I've found out something nifty.&amp;nbsp; It seems
   if my laptop gets too hot and doesn't seem to be able to cool itself off, the processor
   drops its clock speed.&amp;nbsp; I think I knew this already, and I think its called Intel
   SpeedStep.&amp;nbsp; This is nifty in its own right, but what impressed me is that when
   viewing system information (Start | Control Panel | System&amp;nbsp;| General tab), the
   section that tells me about my CPU (I think a custom Dell extension)&amp;nbsp;actually
   changes the clock speed figure to the current clock speed.&amp;nbsp; I was guessing that
   his was a hard coded value based on the max speed of the CPU, but, no, it seems to
   be the current clock speed.&amp;nbsp; The Support Information button just below that,
   which gives the service tab, express service code, and support phone number are nifty
   too.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=b178e1d7-46b0-4610-b842-7681c96ed39c" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,b178e1d7-46b0-4610-b842-7681c96ed39c.aspx</comments>
      <category>About Me;Software Review;Technical</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.lparky.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=f297bcee-bdac-4b14-b289-23e542316364</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.lparky.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,f297bcee-bdac-4b14-b289-23e542316364.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,f297bcee-bdac-4b14-b289-23e542316364.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.lparky.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=f297bcee-bdac-4b14-b289-23e542316364</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      I like the customizability of Windows Media Player with respect to which columns are
      displayed (title, album, play count, rating, etc.) when viewing tracks.  However,
      I'm annoyed that there is no easy way to say, “I want play count to appear right
      before rating no matter how I view my tracks (by playlist, by genre, by album, etc.).” 
      Currently, it seems that I have to tell Play Count to be visible, move it from the
      right most column to sitting just before rating (almost all the way to the left),
      then repeat for each view of the tracks (by playlist, by genre, etc.).  That's
      very annoying.
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=f297bcee-bdac-4b14-b289-23e542316364" />
      </body>
      <title>Make all views look like this one</title>
      <guid>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,f297bcee-bdac-4b14-b289-23e542316364.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.lparky.com/blog/MakeAllViewsLookLikeThisOne.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2004 00:30:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   I like the customizability of Windows Media Player with respect to which columns are
   displayed (title, album, play count, rating, etc.) when viewing tracks.&amp;nbsp; However,
   I'm annoyed that there is no easy way to say, &amp;#8220;I want play count to appear right
   before rating no matter how I view my tracks (by playlist, by genre, by album, etc.).&amp;#8221;&amp;nbsp;
   Currently, it seems that I have to tell Play Count to be visible, move it from the
   right most column to sitting just before rating (almost all the way to the left),
   then repeat for each view of the tracks (by playlist, by genre, etc.).&amp;nbsp; That's
   very annoying.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=f297bcee-bdac-4b14-b289-23e542316364" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,f297bcee-bdac-4b14-b289-23e542316364.aspx</comments>
      <category>Software Review</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.lparky.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=f1968ad0-5af7-4a59-b219-c856a878e232</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.lparky.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,f1968ad0-5af7-4a59-b219-c856a878e232.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,f1968ad0-5af7-4a59-b219-c856a878e232.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.lparky.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=f1968ad0-5af7-4a59-b219-c856a878e232</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      I've recently begun reading ebooks using Microsoft Reader.  I love the "most
      recent page" feature.  The use of ClearType, annotations, and other stuff is
      cool too, but most recent page is a killer usability feature.  Kudos to the Microsoft
      Reader team!
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=f1968ad0-5af7-4a59-b219-c856a878e232" />
      </body>
      <title>A happy Microsoft Reader experience</title>
      <guid>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,f1968ad0-5af7-4a59-b219-c856a878e232.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.lparky.com/blog/AHappyMicrosoftReaderExperience.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2004 00:26:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   I've recently begun reading ebooks using Microsoft Reader.&amp;nbsp; I love the "most
   recent page" feature.&amp;nbsp; The use of ClearType, annotations, and other stuff is
   cool too, but most recent page is a killer usability feature.&amp;nbsp; Kudos to the Microsoft
   Reader team!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=f1968ad0-5af7-4a59-b219-c856a878e232" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,f1968ad0-5af7-4a59-b219-c856a878e232.aspx</comments>
      <category>About Me;Software Review</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.lparky.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=5e329ba3-67b3-40f6-beba-2f615fe94be1</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.lparky.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,5e329ba3-67b3-40f6-beba-2f615fe94be1.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,5e329ba3-67b3-40f6-beba-2f615fe94be1.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.lparky.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=5e329ba3-67b3-40f6-beba-2f615fe94be1</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      Combing my referral logs revealed that someone found my blog by looking for “Kurt
      Cobain's height.”  Since I didn't remember mentioning his height (especially
      since I don't know it), in my post about him a few weeks ago, I investigated further. 
      It seems Yahoo! Search indexed my RSS feed (which includes embedded HTML) and associated
      the words “Kurt” and “Cobain” from my post text with “height”
      from an IMG tag.  It seems to me that Yahoo! needs to tweak its algorithm to
      learn what is content and what is not.
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=5e329ba3-67b3-40f6-beba-2f615fe94be1" />
      </body>
      <title>Yahoo's search is a bit buggy</title>
      <guid>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,5e329ba3-67b3-40f6-beba-2f615fe94be1.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.lparky.com/blog/YahoosSearchIsABitBuggy.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2004 02:53:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   Combing my referral logs revealed that someone found my blog by looking for &amp;#8220;Kurt
   Cobain's height.&amp;#8221;&amp;nbsp; Since I didn't remember mentioning his height (especially
   since I don't know it), in my post about him a few weeks ago, I investigated further.&amp;nbsp;
   It seems Yahoo! Search indexed my RSS feed (which includes embedded HTML) and associated
   the words &amp;#8220;Kurt&amp;#8221; and &amp;#8220;Cobain&amp;#8221; from my post text with &amp;#8220;height&amp;#8221;
   from an IMG tag.&amp;nbsp; It seems to me that Yahoo! needs to tweak its algorithm to
   learn what is content and what is not.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=5e329ba3-67b3-40f6-beba-2f615fe94be1" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,5e329ba3-67b3-40f6-beba-2f615fe94be1.aspx</comments>
      <category>About this blog;Software Review;Technical</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.lparky.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=9eccd91d-c78c-467b-9ed8-08e7cee76714</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.lparky.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,9eccd91d-c78c-467b-9ed8-08e7cee76714.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,9eccd91d-c78c-467b-9ed8-08e7cee76714.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.lparky.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=9eccd91d-c78c-467b-9ed8-08e7cee76714</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      From that happiness that is Windows XP Service Pack 2, I find the unhappiness that
      is a crashing MSN 9 Premium.  I have it (MSN 9) installed on a new Windows XP
      box fully patched (no beta products installed), and it just loves to crash every few
      hours.  The sidebar is cool, but it's not worth the hassle.  Since MSN Explorer
      has a habit of pretending to be Internet Explorer (IE is my default browser), I'm
      not all too sad that I'm taking a break from MSN.
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=9eccd91d-c78c-467b-9ed8-08e7cee76714" />
      </body>
      <title>MSN 9 Premium issues</title>
      <guid>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,9eccd91d-c78c-467b-9ed8-08e7cee76714.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.lparky.com/blog/MSN9PremiumIssues.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2004 02:40:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   From that happiness that is Windows XP Service Pack 2, I find the unhappiness that
   is a crashing MSN 9 Premium.&amp;nbsp; I have it (MSN 9) installed on a new Windows XP
   box fully patched (no beta products installed), and it just loves to crash every few
   hours.&amp;nbsp; The sidebar is cool, but it's not worth the hassle.&amp;nbsp; Since MSN Explorer
   has a habit of pretending to be Internet Explorer (IE is my default browser), I'm
   not all too sad that I'm taking a break from MSN.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=9eccd91d-c78c-467b-9ed8-08e7cee76714" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,9eccd91d-c78c-467b-9ed8-08e7cee76714.aspx</comments>
      <category>Software Review</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.lparky.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=db945311-9ee9-441a-8ddd-5ca3e294f104</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.lparky.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,db945311-9ee9-441a-8ddd-5ca3e294f104.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,db945311-9ee9-441a-8ddd-5ca3e294f104.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.lparky.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=db945311-9ee9-441a-8ddd-5ca3e294f104</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      Today I was pleasantly surprised with an install of Windows XP SP2.  The install
      was smooth.  It recommended that I enable auto update (this was a clean install
      of XP).  After updates, anti virus software was recommended and several options
      were available.  From the very brief glance that I gave SP2 today, I'm impressed.
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=db945311-9ee9-441a-8ddd-5ca3e294f104" />
      </body>
      <title>A first look at Windows XP Service Pack 2</title>
      <guid>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,db945311-9ee9-441a-8ddd-5ca3e294f104.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.lparky.com/blog/AFirstLookAtWindowsXPServicePack2.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2004 05:33:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   Today I was pleasantly surprised with an install of Windows XP SP2.&amp;nbsp; The install
   was smooth.&amp;nbsp; It recommended that I enable auto update (this was a clean install
   of XP).&amp;nbsp; After updates, anti virus software was recommended and several options
   were available.&amp;nbsp; From the very brief glance that I gave SP2 today, I'm impressed.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=db945311-9ee9-441a-8ddd-5ca3e294f104" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,db945311-9ee9-441a-8ddd-5ca3e294f104.aspx</comments>
      <category>Software Review</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.lparky.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=596e2903-494f-481b-a24b-a49007a91fb4</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.lparky.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,596e2903-494f-481b-a24b-a49007a91fb4.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,596e2903-494f-481b-a24b-a49007a91fb4.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.lparky.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=596e2903-494f-481b-a24b-a49007a91fb4</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      I was surprised this morning to discover I had sent myself a warning about the capacity
      of one of my email boxes.  At second glance, I discovered that <a href="http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.beagle.j@mm.html">Bagle.J</a> (McAfee's
      name for it, Syamantec calls it Beagle) had sent it to me.  I saw a handy text
      attachment from McAfee letting me know that the .zip file had been infected with Bagel
      but was now clean.  Hmm, so my AV software did its job and killed the virus,
      but still delivered it to my inbox?  What's the point?  FYI, you were attacked,
      but I made you safe!
   </p>
        <p>
      McAfee's parent company, Network Associates, seems to have the same digestion problem. 
      Its server based AV software began to eat two Bagel'ed emails on one of my IMAP
      accounts, but it only ate the attachment.  It left the email itself (plus message
      telling me I was now safe) in my inbox.  Again, what's the point?
   </p>
        <p>
      It seems to me that a better thing to do, and one far less confusing to consumers,
      is to finish eating the Bagel.  Bagel, NetSky, MyDoom, etc. have no business
      in my inbox even if their attachments are now clean.  Don't just cleanse it. 
      Delete it.  If you want a pat on the back for a job well done, then, perhaps,
      send an email with the text “You were attacked, via email, by 
      <INSERT here="here" name="name" virus="virus" worm="worm">
         , but I made it all better.  (signed) The wonderful folks at 
         <INSERT here="here" name="name" company="company" av="av">
            ”  Even this notification should be optional.  Perhaps there already
            is such an option that I haven't found yet.
         </INSERT></INSERT></p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=596e2903-494f-481b-a24b-a49007a91fb4" />
      </body>
      <title>Partial Bagle Digestion</title>
      <guid>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,596e2903-494f-481b-a24b-a49007a91fb4.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PartialBagleDigestion.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:27:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   I was surprised this morning to discover I had sent myself a warning about the capacity
   of one of my email boxes.&amp;nbsp; At second glance, I discovered that &lt;a href="http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.beagle.j@mm.html"&gt;Bagle.J&lt;/a&gt; (McAfee's
   name for it, Syamantec calls it Beagle) had sent it to me.&amp;nbsp; I saw a handy text
   attachment from McAfee letting me know that the .zip file had been infected with Bagel
   but was now clean.&amp;nbsp; Hmm, so my AV software did its job and killed the virus,
   but still delivered it to my inbox?&amp;nbsp; What's the point?&amp;nbsp; FYI, you were attacked,
   but I made you safe!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   McAfee's parent company, Network Associates, seems to have the same digestion problem.&amp;nbsp;
   Its server based AV software&amp;nbsp;began to eat two Bagel'ed emails on one of my IMAP
   accounts, but it only ate the attachment.&amp;nbsp; It left the email itself (plus&amp;nbsp;message
   telling me I was now safe) in my inbox.&amp;nbsp; Again, what's the point?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   It seems to me that a better thing to do, and one far less confusing to consumers,
   is to finish eating the Bagel.&amp;nbsp; Bagel, NetSky, MyDoom, etc. have no business
   in my inbox even if their attachments are now clean.&amp;nbsp; Don't just cleanse it.&amp;nbsp;
   Delete it.&amp;nbsp; If you want a pat on the back for a job well done, then, perhaps,
   send an email with the text &amp;#8220;You were attacked, via email, by 
   &lt;INSERT here name virus worm&gt;
      , but I made it all better.&amp;nbsp; (signed) The wonderful folks at 
      &lt;INSERT here name company av&gt;
         &amp;#8221;&amp;nbsp; Even this notification should be optional.&amp;nbsp; Perhaps there already
         is such an option that I haven't found yet.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=596e2903-494f-481b-a24b-a49007a91fb4" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,596e2903-494f-481b-a24b-a49007a91fb4.aspx</comments>
      <category>Software Review;Technical</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.lparky.com/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=fbd8cfec-e8f7-4a05-84bd-1fadb5e5bf89</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://www.lparky.com/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,fbd8cfec-e8f7-4a05-84bd-1fadb5e5bf89.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator />
      <wfw:comment>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,fbd8cfec-e8f7-4a05-84bd-1fadb5e5bf89.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://www.lparky.com/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=fbd8cfec-e8f7-4a05-84bd-1fadb5e5bf89</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
      I've created a new category called “Software Review” and this is the maiden
      entry.  Since I talk about my experience with software quite often, I think I'll
      put all future entries that deal with quality or quirkiness into this category.
   </p>
        <p>
      I wonder what should be the result of this formula...
   </p>
        <p>
      Windows XP Pro Start Menu + Visual Studio .NET 2003 = ?
   </p>
        <p>
      Apparently, it means the Visual Studio .NET 2003 Command Prompt jumps into my most
      recently used (MRU) apps list on the Start Menu even though I never use it. 
      Perhaps it was used during the install of VS so extensively that it demanded placement
      in the MRU list.  One of the oddest things, in my opinion, is that it gets a
      decent placement on the list (usually in the top 10 out of 20).
   </p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=fbd8cfec-e8f7-4a05-84bd-1fadb5e5bf89" />
      </body>
      <title>Visual Studio .NET 2003 Command Prompt loves my Start Menu</title>
      <guid>http://www.lparky.com/blog/PermaLink,guid,fbd8cfec-e8f7-4a05-84bd-1fadb5e5bf89.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://www.lparky.com/blog/VisualStudioNET2003CommandPromptLovesMyStartMenu.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2004 17:32:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
   I've created a new category called &amp;#8220;Software Review&amp;#8221; and this is the maiden
   entry.&amp;nbsp; Since I talk about my experience with software quite often, I think I'll
   put all future entries that deal with quality or quirkiness into this category.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   I wonder what should be the result of this formula...
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Windows XP Pro Start Menu + Visual Studio .NET 2003 = ?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
   Apparently, it means the Visual Studio .NET 2003 Command Prompt jumps into my&amp;nbsp;most
   recently used (MRU) apps&amp;nbsp;list on the Start Menu even though I never use it.&amp;nbsp;
   Perhaps it was used during the install of VS so extensively that it demanded placement
   in the MRU list.&amp;nbsp; One of the oddest things, in my opinion, is that it gets a
   decent placement on the list (usually in the top 10 out of 20).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://www.lparky.com/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=fbd8cfec-e8f7-4a05-84bd-1fadb5e5bf89" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://www.lparky.com/blog/CommentView,guid,fbd8cfec-e8f7-4a05-84bd-1fadb5e5bf89.aspx</comments>
      <category>About Me;About this blog;Technical;Software Review</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>